'Claire De Lune' style reading has apparently gone out of fashion, but not for some.
Is there anything more enjoyable, readers everywhere, than fishing for and finishing a good book? Not in my humble opinion.
'Ned's Circus of Marvels'ous clowns is not so Marvellous at all, and full-up of non-clever clowning around town.
Written abruptly it seems, by Monsieur Justin -non-justice fishing for fame and fortune, 'quick buck' Mr. Fisher; this non-read, is not such an amazing, flipping the pages, read at all -unfortunately for buyers everywhere.
This author, evidently -and in my very humble, new budding writer's opinion- is a c'rap' gaming but non-risk taking, circus juggling the characters, around the places, of never ending circular writing.
The not so imaginative, long winded, winding story line of snakes and no ladders; plotting in real life perhaps? but no plotting at all to be found within the pages of the Circus of Marvels, not only confuses Ned -the main confusing non Confucius protagonist-but additionally, I do believe, the readers in general.
Nevertheless, I did not 'soooo' at all enjoy the story line, in terms of 'nofing' at all. Sorry. Really sorry about this book Ned! I mean really sorry about your sorry book Mr. Fisher!
This seems to be yet another Harry Potter lookalike; or is it Ned Potter this time, Mr. Fisher? Please do enlighten the reader about not plagiarising the very original ideas of Mrs J.K. Rowling.
The characters at this Cricus show of a book, of night time 'Claire de Lune' staircase reading, are not at all wise nor are they 'owling' Marvels. They are very lamely and super evidently thinning non stop throughout the pages of the 'riwaya'(story in 'Arabism;)). In this case: the story or 'riwaya'-in Arabic, (seriously though readers of the world: how all over the place is it: 'moi' or is it: Mr. Fisher?), does never progress enough.
Ned is an overactive character, with an exotically underage look at life, but: he is definitely not as intelligent as the respectable author makes him out to be: 'no sir-rey', sorry again for an honest reviewer's 'opinione' Justino.
Mr. Justin, I mean Ned, seems to be extremely confused about the justice of writer's bloc. Perhaps, and in this case only -one really truly truly hopes- leading him, 'oops a daisy', I mean leading Mr. Justin, to try and elaborate on Harry Potter's world -within a Circus environment: fair or no fair Mr Fisher?
I do seriously wonder, if Mrs Rowling has read your latest publication on plagiarised criminally minding your own business, whilst the lady creatively writes originals and you 'fibgit' about your repetitive characterisations.
Mr. O so clever Justino, you fold and refold your chapters, over and over again, with similar lines and dots to all of Mrs Rowling's non growling about your books- in her case of course- not at all in yours Mr. Growing Pains Adrian Mole Fisher. But you are not lady Rowling at all. Full stop.
Or am I inadvertently promoting the reading of your book: let's meet and discuss; no charge at all for helping your future original(?) next time endeavours?
Did you growl and prowl about Mrs Rowling's book contents I do wonder (said I: 'Miss': 'owl plume' writing Gedeon-is the question.)
'To be or not to be': truthful about other authors; an opinion or a fact? Fact or Fiction?: about your lurking around every alleyway corner of the 'Potter' world; pottering about Ned and Co.
Is this book ie: Circus, going to have an ending or a sequel? I do sincerely hope not Mr. geniusgenie in the bottle Fisher! :)
Yawns all round the 'Circus de Lune' townzzzzzz? Falling asleep, as I write this myself -like Mrs Rowling did write her own material herself too-, her own original works (before moi of coursies), Mr Potter/Fisher or what or whom are you exactly Mr Fisher?
The real Shakespearean-like, creatively shaking young children's minds question -in general- is this: Is the critique of creative writing essential to bettering children's story lining or and graphically designed lyrical and musical genius o no?!
Please feel free to disagree any poetry or non 'prose-ing', non prosaic and non 'prosac ing' -L.A. or non L.A. style prosac- fans. No thanks! I say, to this sort of, kind of book (yawns a hundred times again) to the respectable fans of circus clowning around town: book title here: what was the book title again?
Harry Potter is not Ned, by the way, Mr. Justin, non-justice league, Fisher.
All the characters in your huge, repetittititit-tit-ive, non petitioning for you at all, endeavour, or lack of, as the case of your non-Holmes, not even Watson -in your case- may be, lacked depth!
Whatsapp with your plot by the bye forever more Mr fishy writer Fisher?
It just lacks 'personalita'; except for the main character, who, nevertheless remained darkly mysterious as to choice of who he is supposed to be: ie: man about the who wears the crazy pants around the circus house ye all: 'Hall of Fame' is not Ned's but Harry's that's for sure.
You Rock: 'Harry Potter'!
Tune in loony non-townees.
Calling all real writers and genuinely sincere, original 'cartooners', pretty please!!
Any of you out there left/outside the milk carton tooners.
Tune in for for for: the next non freaky and hopefully still well tuned (phewwwie right?) non freak show exposesAtoZays, and reviews of real writers such as J(F)K clarity Rowling, and of writings of other ladies and gentlemen of the Jury writers such as Herself: Rowling original J.K. never growling.
What are your personal views and verdicts on: 'Read All About It' by io? To be published soonish fingers crossed.
There are fortunately still many classically thinking writers like lady Rowling, who are never ever lady luckers but workers harders, and who are certainly not just: luck of the Fisher Price drawer of tricks, such as Justin Timber Lakes (ahoys non-original tooner): Mr. Harry Potter Justin Fisher.
Signed Plume Owl: OwlPlume (photo
above etc etc etc ;))
💪🙎🙍😭😌😣
No comments:
Post a Comment